首页> 外文OA文献 >Differences in the categorization of physics problems by novices and experts
【2h】

Differences in the categorization of physics problems by novices and experts

机译:新手和专家在物理问题分类上的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigates categorization of physics problems. Expectations were that novices use surface structures (explicitly-stated features in the text of physics problems) and experts use deep structures (physics principles that determine and control solutions to physics problems) in the formation of representations;The perspective is obtained from information-processing theory: The representations are viewed as organized knowledge structures within short-term memory, constructed by problem solvers, that describe the environment. Problems are solved by operations on such descriptions. The knowledge within long-term memory used in the formation of a problem representation is accessed when a problem solver categorizes a problem. Choosing a problem category, i.e., the categorization process occurring in short-term memory, allows for the inference of structures that exist in the domain-dependent knowledge base in long-term memory;One of four sets of physics problems was sorted and one physics problem was solved by each of 94 novices (first-year physics students), five intermediates (students who had completed an advanced undergraduate physics course) and 20 experts (professors);Cluster analysis shows that (a) experts categorize according to deep structures and novices use surface features and deep structures in the categorization process and (b) the categorization by novices is less consistent than the categorization by experts. Differences in expert-like behavior in the sorting and solving tasks were found to exist among the novices. The analysis of variance, on the alpha = .05 level, does not show these differences to be related to the ACT science score, the final grade in Physics 221, and the high school class rank. However, expert-like behavior correlates with the final grade in Physics 221 at the significance level of 0.0338;The inclusion of greater numbers of subjects than is customary in this kind of research contributes toward a greater degree of generalization. The use of dendograms and the variable that measures the degree of expert-like behavior allow for better reproducibility.
机译:这项研究调查了物理问题的分类。期望新手在表示形式的形成中使用表面结构(物理问题中明确指出的特征),而专家使用深层结构(确定和控制物理问题解决方案的物理原理);从信息处理中获得观点理论:表示形式被视为由问题解决者构造的描述环境的短期记忆中的有组织的知识结构。通过对这样的描述进行操作来解决问题。当问题解决者对问题进行分类时,将访问用于形成问题表示形式的长期内存中的知识。选择问题类别,即发生在短期记忆中的分类过程,可以推断长期记忆中依赖于领域的知识库中存在的结构;排序了四组物理问题中的一组,一个物理94名新手(一年级物理学生),五个中级(已完成高级物理学课程的学生)和20名专家(教授)均解决了该问题;集群分析表明(a)专家根据深层结构进行分类,并且新手在分类过程中使用表面特征和深层结构,并且(b)新手的分类与专家的分类不一致。发现在新手之间存在排序和解决任务中类似专家行为的差异。在方差= 0.05的水平上进行的方差分析未显示出这些差异与ACT科学成绩,物理221的最终成绩以及高中班级成绩相关。但是,类似专家的行为与物理221的最终成绩在0.0338的显着性水平上相关;比这种研究中的常规水平包含更多的科目,有助于更广泛的概括。使用树状图和可测量专家行为程度的变量可实现更好的可重复性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Veldhuis, G. Henry;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1986
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号